Does Your Mask Protects You If Nobody Else Is Wearing it, According to Different Studies
If you are the only person wearing a mask in a store or different indoor location, are you really protected from infection?
It is true that masks work best when everyone in the room is wearing one. That is because when an infected character wears a mask, a large percentage of their exhaled infectious particles are trapped, stopping viral spread at the source. And when fewer viral particles are floating around the room, the masks others are wearing would likely block these that have escaped.
But there is also plenty of evidence showing that masks defend the wearer even when others around them are mask-free. The amount of protection depends on the quality of the mask and how well it fits. During a hotel outbreak in Switzerland, for instance, several employees and a guest who tested positive for the coronavirus were wearing only face shields (with no masks); those who wore masks were not infected. And a Tennessee study located that communities with mask mandates had lower hospitalization rates than areas where masks were not required.
“Health care workers, scientists who work with nasty pathogens and people who may be uncovered to hazardous airborne particles on the job rely on specialized masks like N95s for protection, so we know that properly fitted, high-efficiency masks work,” said Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech engineering professor and one of the world’s leading experts on viral transmission.
A number of laboratory studies have also documented that a mask protects the person who is wearing it, although the level of that protection can vary depending on the type of mask, the material it is made from, the experimental setup and how particle exposure was measured.
But the bottom line of all the studies is that a mask reduces the potential exposure of the person wearing it. Here are some of the findings.
— One study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that a standard surgical mask only protected the wearer from about 7.5% of the particles generated by a simulated cough. But knotting the loops and tucking in the sides of the medical mask decreased exposure by nearly 65%. Covering the surgical mask with a cloth mask, a technique known as double masking, reduced exposure to the simulated cough particles by 83%.
— A Virginia Tech study looked at how well homemade masks, surgical masks and face shields protected the wearer, based on particle size. The research showed that most masks could block very large particles, like those from a sneeze. But when the researchers looked at smaller aerosol particles that are hardest to block, protection ranged from near zero with a face shield to about 30% protection with a surgical mask. (The percentages in the study cannot be directly in contrast to the CDC knot-and-tuck study because the testing methods were different.) Based on the findings, Marr and her colleagues concluded that a two-layer cloth mask made of flexible, tightly woven fabric, combined with a filter material (like a coffee filter or surgical mask), could offer good protection, reducing 70% of the most penetrating particles and trapping 90% or more of the larger particles. They also determined that head straps or ties created a better fit than ear loops.
— A study from Tokyo tested how well different types of masks protected the wearer from actual coronavirus particles. The study confirmed that even a simple cotton mask offered some protection (17% to 27%) to the wearer. Medical masks performed better, such as a surgical mask (47% to 50% protection), a loose fitting N95 (57% to 86% protection) and a tightly sealed N95 (79% to 90% protection).
— While many lab studies test masks using mannequin heads, a 2008 study used real people to measure how well masks could protect the wearer against a respiratory virus. The study subjects wore different kinds of masks fitted with special receptors that could measure particle concentration on both sides of the masks. In this study, cloth masks reduced exposure by 60%, surgical masks by 76% and N95 masks by 99%.
While the lab studies all show a mask can protect the wearer, how well the masks perform in the real world depends on a number of variables, including how consistently people use them, whether a person is in high-risk situations and the rate of infection in the community. A Danish study of 6,000 participants, half of whom were informed to put on masks, did not show a benefit to mask wearing, but the study has been widely criticized for its poor design.
The laboratory studies showed that a high-quality medical mask, such as an N95, KN95 or KF94, works best. While vaccination is the best protection against COVID-19, even vaccinated people are advised to avoid crowds or large groups indoors when the vaccination status of others is not known. Given that the delta variant is far more contagious than different variants, Marr additionally recommended wearing the highest-quality mask possible when you cannot keep your distance or be outdoors — or when nobody around you is masking up.
“If I’m in a situation where I have to rely solely on my masks for protection — unvaccinated people may be present, it’s crowded, I don’t know anything about the ventilation — I would wear the best masks in my wardrobe, which is an N95,” Marr said. “Because delta has proved to be so much more easily transmitted and because vaccinated people can transmit, we need to wear the best masks possible in high-risk situations.”
Originally published: Yahoo News